Saturday, July 25, 2009

Despite having a late morning, today due to the usual Friday night festivities (Vball, ipoh and boardgames till wee hours of the morning) I was able to do everything I needed to do and I was able to cook dinner for tonight because Mom's been under the weather lately (There is speculation that I prossibly gave it to her last week.)

Anyways, so what did I prepare? Well I cooked a dish called "Middle-Eastern Lamb Casserole." I have never eaten the dish before, but Mom found the recipe and really wanted to cook it. So I put my hand up as I have been wanting to dust off the mini mouse cooking apron I got from Hong Kong Disneyland and practice my 'real life' cooking mama skills.

I will admit that at first I was kind of daunted, because it has been a while since I've worked the kitchen, but once I got started it was a-ok. Prepared the ingredients, chopped, diced, sliced, grind... the usual, but then when it came to the lamb... crap. I've never extracted meat for the purposes of dicing it up from where it was still on the bone. This was definitely a culinary challenge. Took me a good 30-40 minutes, but I was able to complete the mission without a trace of meat left on the bone *Hooraaah!*

After that it was down hill from that. Cooking mama style, I added the ingredients at the appropriate times, I adjusted the flame at the correct time and made amendments to the dish at my discretion as I tasted it every few minutes. At this moment it is simmering at a low heat and filling up my house with a spicy warm yummy aroma!

Labels:

posted by anna at 4:24 PM | 0 comments
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Introductory Notes

Dear Readers, hee hee I've always wanted to say that!

I was reading this paper that I submitted for my criminology unit in 2008. I worked my ass off researching this. And for a somewhat convoluted question, with hardly any resources, I did an all right job on it. It was interesting to research especially after my trip to Hakea Prison which I actually did a blog entry for which you can read here: http://thelilbanana.blogspot.com/2008/04/visiting-hakea-prison.html

The formatting is a bit out of whack, all my footnotes are missing which is a pain because they are pretty informative, but all the material which I have referred to are at the end of this entry. I actually miss researching and writing down my conclusions into a nice, tight paper. Maybe if I'm bored I'll try and do some in my spare time. I've done some research on doctor's duties in relation to the emergence of alternative medicine. If I can find time, I may dabble a bit.

But now I'm way off track.

Okies, so if your bored, its an interesting read. Let me know what you think. If your lazy... perhaps move along and read another time, or at least read my hakea prison entry. lol

The importance of understanding criminological theory when responding to crime:

The Criminal Justice System in WA

Anna Sasson

1.0 Introduction

Theory is part of an explanation, which connects a particular trend to the world of information, beliefs and attitudes of a people at a particular time or place. Various criminological theories have emerged as a means to discover the causes of criminal behaviour and to utilise that knowledge to prevent and decrease the rate of crime within society. This ultimately has resulted in some contradicting criminological theories such as the classical and positivist schools of thought. Yet these inconsistencies within the field do not diminish the importance of utilising this body of knowledge that has grown over time when considering the administration of the WA criminal justice system.

In WA, there appears to be a lack active utilisation of criminological theory within its criminal justice system. Nevertheless, in hindsight, one can relate criminological theories to WA’s response to crime through its various situational crime prevention schemes such as the Neighbourhood Watch program and Operation Burglary Countdown. Despite the fact that these initiatives has had some success and is cost efficient, this paper argues that the WA’s criminal justice system should take a more self-conscious, multi-faceted approach when responding to crime by utilising criminological principles such as classicism and positivism as a foundation and guide to implement more schemes with a stronger focus on socio-political issues within the community, such as the WA Alcohol Plan (Alcohol Plan) and Liveable Neighbourhoods Sustainable Cities Initiative (Liveable Neighbourhoods) and to provide a more complex understanding of criminal behaviour within the WA criminal law sentencing process.

2.0 Criminological Theory

2.1 Classical and neo classical criminology

The underlaying concept of the classical school of criminological theory is that humans are capable of understanding themselves and as a consequence act in such a way to promote their own best interests. Crime is therefore perceived as a result of the free choice of the offender who rationalises his or her criminal behaviour by assessing the potential benefits against the potential costs. Neo classical criminologists built upon this foundation and updated the concept with the notion of “rational choice theory,” taking into consideration other disciplines such as economics, economics psychology and sociology.

Classical and neo classical criminology has led to the concept of deterrence. Deterrence refers to increasing the costs and decreasing the benefits of crime so that individuals will rationally choose not to commit the crime. In light of this, criminologists have attempted to formulate methods of punishment and various situational crime preventative schemes to decrease the rates of criminal offences. This approach has been prevalent in the WA criminal justice system’s response to crime and could be used more so within the criminal sentencing principles.

2.2 Positivism – The psychological and sociological factors

In contrast to the classical schools of criminology, positivist theorists rest their ideas on the concept that criminal behaviour is caused by factors that go beyond the offender’s control. Instead of balancing on the costs and benefits, thinking and reasoning are merely a process of rationalisation which individuals justify their predetermined courses of action. Originally positivism was focused was on biological factors, but more recently the emphasis has been shifted to the psychological and the social factors that contribute to causes of criminal behaviour. Some of the social factors include economic depravation and lack of education, where an individual as been cultured within an area that has been ‘fertile grounds’ for the evolution of delinquent behaviours and values over generations, therefore not knowing any better than to act in antisocial manner. This principle would be better utilised as an aspect to consider in developing crime preventative schemes, but may be problematic if used within the criminal sentencing process.

3.0 Criminological Theory and Preventing Crime in Western Australia

3.1 Criminology in community based situational crime prevention

Situational crime prevention initiatives can be said to stem from neo classicism and the rational choice theory. They emphasise micro-preventative crime strategies utilising local authorities, business and the public to use practical deterrents. Promoting a crime-specific approach, deterrents are focused on changing the environment or situational factors around an individual so that the costs to perpetrate the crime outweigh any possible benefits. In WA such measures can be exemplified by Neighbourhood Watch and Operation Burglary Countdown programs which target blue collared crimes.

Neighbourhood Watch

Neighbourhood Watch was initiated by the WA government in the 1980s in a response to the high rates of burglaries within the residential areas. It is a system of a positive communication and active citizenship between the community and the WA police, as it is the residents who have the special knowledge of what is usual social activity and what is unusual social activity within their neighbourhood. In hindsight, it can be read to be a situational crime preventative initiative as the aim is to change the residential environment to a place where individuals were to be deterred from making their rational choice to commit an offence in areas where the Neighbourhood watch is active. Despite the increased awareness and knowledge of citizens within a Neighbourhood watch area, the success of this initiative relies on the extent of the involvement and maintenance of interest of both the police and residents in the program, and the issue of displacement, where crimes would transfer to other neighbourhoods arises. Therefore there is uncertainty as to whether this program would have any long term effects on crime rates.

Operation Burglary Countdown

Operation Burglary Countdown specifically refers to utilising the rationale choice theory by introducing various schemes aimed to reduce the offender’s confidence and the appeal in conducting a successful burglary by making the crime more difficult to commit and making apprehension and conviction more likely. Some of the series of community based initiatives of Operation Burglary Countdown include ‘providing information and increasing awareness for householders, free home security audits for victims of burglary, support and advice for victims, development of divisionary recreational programs for youths at risk,’ local community development, an interactive email system that alerts residents of local crime in real time (E-Crime Alert). In comparison to the Neighbourhood watch programs this appears to have more success in that there is a stronger socio-political focus by the involvement within various groups within a community and the police, rather than just relying on the initiative of the residents within an area.

3.2 Criminology in macro level socio-political initiatives

Macro level socio-political initiatives are characterised as complex, costly and does not necessarily provide an immediate affect on crime. Yet despite the “costs” of implementing such schemes, the “benefits” are more long term. This is due to the fact it is a multifaceted approach which targets the environmental, social, economic and the psychological factors of citizens. These initiatives affect the rational choice of an individual, creating an environment which does not support criminal behaviour, it educates and focuses on changing the attitudes of society so that individuals are encouraged to interact positively within the community or face punishment and social disapproval. WA’s Liveable Neighbourhoods and Alcohol plan are examples of macro level preventative schemes.

WA’s Liveable Neighbourhoods

The Liveable Neighbourhoods initiative provides a planning framework of macro crime preventative measures such as community environmental design, movement network, public parkland, activity centres, employment and schools in order to open up and make neighbourhoods more accessible in order to ‘design’ out crime from communities. This retrospectively can be interpreted to focus on those environmental issues raised in positivism, that contribute to the development of an individual’s upbringing and the replacement of a social stigma and attitude away from a delinquent culture to a more positive and social way of life. The City of Gosnells utilised the recommendations from the Liveable Neighbourhoods and implemented a Safecity Urban Design Strategy which aimed to develop building designs and urban structure which would reduce the opportunities for crime to occur and promote an environment where the community would have more interaction, and passive surveillance. The success of this scheme has included the reduction of burglaries, theft and car crime within the whole City. Other programs such as the New Living projects under the Ministry of Housing attempt to revitalise urban areas such as Bunbury, and Armadale/Kelmscott attempt to achieve similar results.

WA’s Alcohol Plan

There is a strong correlation between alcohol abuse and crime. Therefore controlling and decreasing alcohol abuse provides multiple benefits to the community and to individuals. The WA Alcohol Plan (Alcohol Plan) is an initiative of the WA’s Drug and Alcohol Strategy implemented by the State Government to change the attitudes of the society to a culture of responsible alcohol use in order to promote healthier and safer community.

The Alcohol Plan targets three key aspects within the community in order to implement a multifaceted socio-political change in the attitudes towards alcohol, The first key area is the assistance to young people to avoid high risk alcohol consumption. This utilises the school system to instil a continuous drug and alcohol education to students that aims at developing a safe and positive attitude towards the use of drugs and alcohol. Educational programs include theory, reflective practice, evaluation and an increased parent and community involvement for an all-round approach that promotes non-contradictory messages. An emphasis is also placed on effective school organisation and behaviour management to encourage the development of positive social relationships within schools in order to prevent antisocial behaviour that leads to a greater risk in youth alcohol use.

The second area focuses increasing the ‘capacity and commitment of communities to take ownership and control of factors within their local environment that impact on alcohol related problems.’ This includes changing the attitudes within the community by the building awareness as to the possible health and social harms of alcohol abuse such as underage drinking, drink driving, and family and domestic violence through the use of the media. The last key area is the enforcement of responsible supply and service of alcohol. This includes enforcing laws that prohibit under age drinking, the requirement for persons serving alcohol to have taken a Responsible Service of Alcohol course, the review of the locality and trading hours of liquor outlets, and the consideration of the imposition of tax.

4.0 Criminology in criminal sentencing

Another area where criminology should have a stronger influence is WA’s criminal sentencing process. The inclusion of criminological theory into the decision making process for the judiciary allows judges to impose the most appropriate sentencing by taking into consideration all the circumstances of the offence and the offender. Criminological theories would shed light as to the motivation and the reason for the criminal offence. Yet, so far with respect to judicial decision making in criminal matters, criminology is not actively utilised. Instead it appears that criminology merely runs parallel with the ideological administration of criminal justice as commentary rather than actual implementation or influence in the development of criminal sentencing.

Criminology not being utilised in the decision making process for criminal sentencing and for the developmental stages of government schemes to prevent crime, could be attributed to the fact that the theories tend to pose a lot more contradictions than providing a concrete explanation of crime. Contradictions such as those found in positivism referring to the rates of crime relative to the rates of unemployment, poverty and lack of education. The issue is the inability of criminological theory to establish the cause of crimes to the appropriate standard of proof. There are too many inconsistencies in the theories behind why some people would commit a crime, and while others do not.

5.0 Conclusion

In comparison to the Neighbourhood Watch and Operation Burglary Countdown initiatives, the WA Liveable Neighbourhoods and Alcohol Plan are more complex, costly and do not necessarily provide an immediate affect on crime. Yet despite the “costs” of implementing these schemes, the “benefits” are more long term. Unlike the Neighbourhood Watch, Operation Burglary Countdown and other situational crime preventative schemes which targets a specific crime, the Liveable Neighbourhoods and Alcohol Plan aims to eliminate or control possible significant factors that attribute to the causes criminal behaviour therefore providing a slow, but long lasting cultural change within the community. Unfortunately there does not seem to be any direct reference or application of criminological theory within the public policies of the community based situational crime prevention, the socio-political initiatives or within the criminal sentencing process, yet the importance of criminology in the WA criminal law remains. Without criminological theories our WA criminal law and its justice system would not be a self conscious, reflective process and therefore may create blind spots which would develop over time with the changes in society.

References:

Books:

• Clarke, Ronald V, Situational Crime Prevention – Successful Case Studies, Harrow & Heston Publishers, Guilderland, NY (1997).

• Vold, George b., Bernard, Thomas J., Snipes, Jeffery b., Theoretical Criminology 5th Edition, NY, Oxford Uni Press (2002).

Journal Articles:

• Edney, Richard, ‘Models of Understanding Criminal Behaviour and the Sentencing Process: A Place for Criminological Theory?,” The Journal of Criminal Law (2006) Vol 70, Issue 3, pg 247.

• Glaser, Daniel, Rice Kent, ‘Crime, Age and Employment,’ American Sociological Review (1959) Vol 24, pg 679-686.

• Hayward, Keith, ‘Situational Crime Prevention and its Discontents: Rational Choice Theory verses the ‘Culture of the Now,’’ Social Policy & Administration, (2007), Vol 41, No 3 pg 232.

• Mukheriee, Satyanshu, Wilson, Paul, ‘Neighbourhood watch: issues and policy implications,’ Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice,’ (1987) No 8, Australian Institute of Criminology.

• Schlag, P, ‘Law and Phrenology’ (1996) Harvard Law Review 877.


Reports:

• Cummings, Dr Rick, ‘Operation Burglary Countdown, November 2003-October 2004 – Evaluation Study Final Report,’ (2005) Prepared for the Office of Crime Prevention Government of Western Australia,

• Haigh, Yvonne, ‘Promoting Safer Communities through Physical Design, Social Inclusion and Crime Prevention through Environmental Design – a Developmental Study,’ (2006) published by the Centre for Social and Community Research.

• Loxley, Wendy, Lien, Debbie, ‘Drug Use Monitoring in Australia: Western Australian 2000 Report on Drug Use Among Police Detainees,’ (2001) Published by the National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University of Technology, Perth WA, pg v;

• West Australian Alcohol Plan 2006-2009, produced by the Drug and Alcohol Office, 2006.


Ministerial Media Statements:

• ‘State Government launches successful anti-burglary program in Carnarvon.’ 26/07/2004, at: http://www.mediastatements.wa.gov.au/Lists/Statements/DispForm.aspx?ID=122421 Viewed on 30 April 2006.


Websites:

• Enough is Enough Website at: http://www1.enoughisenough.com.au/ , Viewed on 30 April 2008,.

• Land and Housing Development website: http://www.dhw.wa.gov.au/landsales/site_files/communities/community.htm Viewed on 25 April 2008.

• Neighbourhood Watch (WA Online) at : http://www.nhw.wa.gov.au/ . Viewed on 28 April 2008.

• Office of Road Safety website at: http://www.officeofroadsafety.wa.gov.au/index.cfm?event=topicsDrinkDriving. Viewed on 15 April 2008.

Labels: ,

posted by anna at 7:00 PM | 0 comments
Wednesday, July 15, 2009

A thin Beef patty with tomato, lettuce, cheese and beetroot. The bun was soft, yet tend to get soggy at the base due to the tomato and beetroot. Unfortunately it slightly disappointed me, there was no suprise taste, no special trademark mayo, which is what one would expect from the burger named after the burger joint itself. Price wise, its cheaper than the flying scotsman in mount lawley, but id prefer to pay an extra 5 bucks for the burger there.

Labels: ,

posted by anna at 8:21 AM | 0 comments
Sunday, July 12, 2009

Only a tool would park right up my butt like this.
posted by anna at 11:24 PM | 0 comments
Saturday, July 11, 2009

A photo I was forwarded, and thought it was cute/funny/wrong all at the same time


I've been in a vacuum the past month due to my ATP (Articled Training Program) which I need to complete in order to be admitted at the end of my first year working as an Articled Clerk. As a result, things such as the passing of Michael Jackson (MJ), swept over me like the sea breeze. I didn't really have the chance to "mourn" him by watching all of those Michael Jackson tribute shows etc.

But this morning, since I was able to have an earlish night for a Friday, I was able to get up and watch all the Tributes that were on TV due to my mom diligently taping all MJ stuff. (She did the exact same thing when Princess Diana died). There was A LOT of stuff, and a lot of it was repetitive, just in case you didn't manage to get the point the first time. In the end, after watching commentary that had snippets of his performances and interviews for 2 hours, I lost patience and couldn't be bothered searching for his Farewell Tribute that I initially intended to watch.

But, I did get to watch a snippet of his last performance with his brothers at I think it was MJ's 50th Birthday Concert. It was only then did I start to get that sinking sorrow feeling in my stomach. I didn't know what it was... until they played their last song together when it clicked... I felt pitty.

MJ was a great vocalist, musician and an all round, one of a kind entertainer. He himself was a brand that transcended cross culturally. He could dance, he started trends, his music is so damn catchy that you can't stop your body from bopping or tapping your feet. The pitty hit me when I realised that this talented person, no matter how successful he was when he was younger, never lived to his full potential personally, and possibly within his career, and I attribute this to the whole Fame Game and the Media. That is the Media killed it's own creation.

I say this because, when I saw him performing with his brothers, all of whom look physically healthy, sane and well... all of whom had aged gracefully, MJ really looked strange. MJ sounded the same way he did back when he was in the Jackson 5, he acted the same, danced the same, he was still and I guess will always be, the younger brother no matter what his age. In essence, MJ was the same boy from Jackson 5, its just for some reason this huge kid was stuck in this clowned face with no nose, weird, pale-skinned, skeleton of a body. All that plastic surgery had made this fresh-faced teeny bopper into something strange. He looked fictitious.

It stood out because of all the commentary that I had watched earlier. They showed video clips of MJ when he was younger, happier and well...more natural. He looked like his brothers, he fit in. Then he hit his early 20s and unlike the other Jackson 5 band members, he became a superstar with the release of his album Thriller. It is around this time that MJ apparently started to fall. His face, his antics, his personal life all became questionable and food for the media. At the time, I guess this would have been the first time the media saw such a well-loved American boy scout fall from grace. He had it hard.

Now a days it is the norm for child stars to go crazy. The booze, the sex tapes, the scandalous outfits. I mean from a young age they were told what to do, how to act, what to wear, what to say. They had no freedoms to grow into people, and psychologically they were programmed to be whatever everyone else wanted them to be. But back then when MJ burst onto the scene, it was rare to see a child star go bonkers, (I mean think about it, the squeaky clean Brady Bunch were HUGE back then) and because of that, I guess MJ had it hard. The media ate it up. Look how the media loved Britney Spears. Anything she did was 'scandalous.' Both MJ and Britney were famous from a very young age, and both were continuously scrutinised in the media for whatever reason. But MJ was a superstar at the age of say 8-10 years old. Britney even though she was in the media from around the same age, only hit super stardom at around the age of 16 years. She has had those extra years of a somewhat 'normal' life.

Another factor, is that Britney was an attractive, blonde-haired, cheerleader all American Sweetheart. Whereas MJ was a young, African American male trying to breaking down all those social conventions in the US and paving the way to mainstream. Britney only really had to deal with the media scrutinising on her fashion, her weight, her antics as a party/trash animal. MJ had to deal with all those pressures imposed by the Fame Game and the media plus the fact that he would have to deal with his ethnic differences and trying to fit into the "American Mould" too.

Even myself, being an Australian born asian. Born within a relatively more "open" society, when I was younger, all I wanted to do was to fit in with everyone else. All I wanted was to be accepted. Heck, I didn't even think I had almond-squinty eyes and black hair. I was only reminded of this when I saw photos of myself and my friends... and when I saw how different I was. It was like a cold slap of reality. It somehow made me feel alien-like, and I hated it. I hated the way I looked. I hated that I was different. No one likes being alien. Imagine me feeling the way I did back then, and then add in that I had millions of dollars. Back then, before I was able to accept what I was, I too would probably have gotten surgery to "fix" the squintyness.

But lucky for me, I didn't have squillions of dollars. Lucky for me, I had privacy which was afforded to me by a life of meritocracy and I was able to experiment, and go a little insane as one does when they try to find themselves, within the confines of my small life and not have billions of people judge me for it.

Britney and MJ were unlucky. They didn't have that simple pleasure of privacy and alone time. Lucky for Britney, she is on a come back, and I really do hope she pulls through. I think its probably because of those extra years of 'normalcy' that she is able to pull through this, because she has something to refer back to before she was a superstar. She has those memories of what she was like before having to act, dance and sing like a puppet for the masses. Unlucky for MJ... he... well, never had a chance really. For all he knew was life in the media and life where one is always judged upon. He never had friends who were friends because they had the same interests. In fact, he probably never had the chance to find out what he was interested in. The only people he could ever get close to where people connected to his career, the entertainment business or his family... and when your public life is such a mess, and you don't have an extensive support of both friends and family, I think you would definitely have a few loose screws in the workshop. I think MJ had it rough, and that transcended into his music/reputation/career, and once a Brand's reputation is shot, that product no longer has the credibility it once had, unless the Brand changes. For Britney, she still has room for change and improvement to reinvent herself. MJ, if he didn't make such drastic permanent changes, his image/Brand may have had a chance.
posted by anna at 10:23 AM | 1 comments